In regard to accuracy, this is about like saying how accurate is my Toyota in getting me from point A to point B  vs.  a Ford.  The answer will be slightly different for different applications / types of tests.  It really is not a cute trick here to try and pit one Examiner against another in regard to a perfect number on this.  What is important is that non-Examiners (Peer Review) researchers such as the Johns Hopkins University (Statistics / Math types / Software Engineers) create the best possible "objective" scoring software for such applications, because most of the complaints here are about the perceived subjective way in which someone was treated.  Did you think these Examiners fell off the back of a turnip truck or something, NO, they are among the best and brightest from their respective agencies prior to attending DodPI / DACA, and have absorbed this training quickly, and have QC over them as well.  This site has attempted to demonize all Examiners.  I've often wondered why it is that you out there who are seeking a career in these same agencies believe in a sheepish flock mentality that someone who is an Examiner would be of a disposition to throw all ethics to the side and use something that did not work as you claim for the many years they commit to this profession.  One thing is for sure; the polygraph, and particularly the computerized version, can NOT both work AND not work at the same time.  Therefore, given the number of confirmed charts from not only confessions, but also other evidence, it must have not only utility but accuracy.  It has been invented, improved, studied, and utilized by better men than you historically who have had their backgrounds confirmed.  They don't take that trust lightly, and like you are looking to make a contribution to the effort of Truth.  I don't think I have ever seen such a generation of self centered snot nosed kids with a sense of entitlement than what I have seen here, along with admitted child molesters on probation and parole.  I just thank God that I don't have to work side by side with you and that somebody did their job and perhaps found better applicants to meet the needs and NOT you Larry.  Stop your bitching and go out into the world and prove something in the private sector or military, or non-profit world--------- before coming here and telling us about how we are missing out by NOT hiring you.  I'm telling you what I think the agency might have been trying to say between the lines------- Park Your Ego at the dam door !