candy wrote on Jan 17^th, 2008 at 4:30pm:

EJ, Your reply is tragic. According to you, as your post infers, the 1st examiners mistake (that nearly cost D his job) is not a big deal. But we shouldnt dare to criticise the incompetent examiner !!! Why ? Because a hopelessly wrong result is not as bad as being raped........!! And then you have the temerity to infer that perhaps D failed because he stole something prior...........My goodness but you have a twisted and ascerbic view of life. Is that the escape alibi of all examiners? ("He must have stolen something else in the same timeframe" ) Apparently you have become so cynical in plying your trade, that the ruined lives dotting the landscape here and there is simply collateral damage. No big deal. Its a big deal. Believe me, its a big deal.

Very poetic. Due to us not having ;
a. The charts
b. The precise questions
c. The investigative facts
d. A physiological and psychological profile of your bro
e. Your brothrs first hand acount

....we can only look at alternatives. Sure the examiner might have really screwed up. It happens. My Mom's doctor made her permanently blind because he prescribed her the wrong medication. Aweful shit happens. She still has an albeit suspicious belief in modern medicine, but she understands that people make enormous mistakes, but that doesn't altogether impune the validity of modern medical testing. Absent facts regarding Mom's previous moron doctor's notes and testing procedures,, her second physician inquired Mom about what sorts of pre-existing conditions SHE might have had and not disclosed. It was painful for her, but she had far less righteous indignation than you people. Does this manner of analysis sound familiar Candy?