EJ, Your reply is tragic. According to you, as your post infers, the 1st examiners mistake (that nearly cost D his job) is not a big deal. But we shouldnt dare to criticise the incompetent examiner !!! Why ? Because a hopelessly wrong result is not as bad as being raped........!!
And then you have the temerity to infer that perhaps D failed because he stole something prior...........My goodness but you have a twisted and ascerbic view of life. Is that the escape alibi of all examiners? ("He must have stolen something else in the same timeframe" )
Apparently you have become so cynical in plying your trade, that the ruined lives dotting the landscape here and there is simply collateral damage. No big deal.

Its a big deal. Believe me, its a big deal.