wrote on Feb 28^th, 2007 at 5:43pm:

Ethics would say yes be honest.  George advocated it then gave you an option to defeat the polygraph by using his book to defeat the exam on the pretext that polygraph is not an accurate measure of truth.  So will you use ethics and be honest, or use the countermeasures and be dishonest?

LieNot,

Lets see, to believe authors like Lykken, Clifton, Maschke, Furedy, or even Doug Williams on polygraphs. Or the option is to listen to you and your lack of anything credible. Hmmmm,  I don't think their is any contest here. Unless you have something of academic or scientific worth to support your position. Which doesn't exist, unless its something written by other polygraphers. I just love professional nepotism, you can always guarantee your position !! But how about some real verbage with some substance next time, not just a cheap shot and go back into hiding. And by your previous posts, if your not worried about countermeasures why even post. The more people that have indepth polygraph knowlege, the less that have any fear of it. And without the fear, you have nothing, except a nice little interrogation tool that doesn't intimidate anyone. And eventually its use becomes mute.
And self protection from the likes of you in all cases. So its honesty with countermeasures knowlege, nothing unethical there.



Regards .....