Paradiddle wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2007 at 4:46pm:

The report states that the men conducted a "lengthy interrogation." I have never ran a test that lasted longer than 3 1/2 hrs-4 hrs in length. Cops have interrogated for up to 18 hours in shameful cases. There are differences in the dynamics of the two methods, regardless of what you state. I might know a thing or two Eos, so take my word.

Paradiddle,

Nice deflection, but we really need to focus on this. So it is still your position that the polygrapher had no hand in this mess, that his maximum 3.5 - 4 hour interrogation was just noise. Its not like most polygraphers, are not interrogators / investigative agents. A change of clothes does not change the obvious.  

Take your word for it ? That  remarks reminds of a revised smart remark, "I am a polygrapher and I am here to help you !!".  Where are your facts. We all need to understand how this polygraphers testing time, contributed to this systemic failure. A polygraph pathology as it were.  I am sure you can get the info and charts from your brethern polygraphers. Please do post your report, as we all wish to be impressed with your investigative and reporting skills. I am waiting to see the thing you know and the second thing too. Should be quite illuminating.

Best Regards ....