Paradiddle wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2007 at 1:26pm:

I wonder if he also suffered polygraph induced diarrhea? Now you have gone as far as to invalidate your military training as an interrogater----in that a false confession from an interrogation is a false confession from an interrogation, period. If the cop were wearing a bow tie, than the confession wouldn't be labeled a "bow-tie induced false confession." Interrogation =accusation. Either way ya slice it, cops who accuse without savvy will get false confessions.

ParaDiddle,

So lets re-evaluate this then, Its the cops fault, and the polygrapher has no duplicity at all. In your honest polygrapher opinion this person being induced to a confession is nothing more than a simple mistake. Collateral damage in the grand plan that the polygraph and polygraphers are here to help you, and its just the cost of doing business. Lets see 16 years in prison for a cascading failure of the worst kind. Destroying a persons life, with a machine touted with 98 % validity, by many members of your profession. Please do discuss and define this problem set so all can understand. Because with the right environment and tool, I could have made this kid, think he killed Hoffa and buried him in the Meadowlands. I really want to know the scientific principles that you and this polygrapher used. That if ever faced again with a polygraph, I can feel assured that I am getting the best polygrapher available with sound scientific objectivity.

Regards ......