wrote on May 23^rd, 2006 at 3:20pm:

What this essentially boils down to is that some polygraphers are willing to fudge their scoring to go with their gut. While some applicants may benefit from such fudging, those who don't "pass" the polygraph (with or without the application of a fudge factor) don't get hired.

I think this is an accurate way to describe activity such as Retcopper wrote about.

Since they admit they will disregard polygraph "results" if their instincts tell them an applicant should pass, is there any reason to believe they would not disregard "results" if their instincts tell them an applicant should not pass?