ABC News. chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross shines the spotlight on Charles Humble and CVSA in an article titled "Innocent Until Proved Guilty?":

https://web.archive.org/web/20060405214557/http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=1786421&page=1

I especially like the helicopter bringing the owner to work.

I would like to get my hands on a CVSA and play back Charles Humble's interview through it and see if he is being deceptive  ;D

My question is:
If the polygraph is so scientifically unsound why doesn't Prime Time expose it's invalidity also?

Just as it appears on this forum, countless folks have been wrongfully accused and suffered great lose from polygraphy. Why are they any different than the victims on last nights show that were tormented by a CVSA?

Could it be someone is being paid to Hush Hush?

Hum :-/

IF... IF the footage on that news spot really showed an actual CVSA unit (a laptop), then I sincerely believe that it does less than "novelty" voice-stress lie detectors that are merely sound level meters and blinking lights. The CVSA on the news did less. The voice patterns did not match what was being said, nor any [real, true, physically possible voice waveform], but apparently was just a random predrawn scribblewave "card" appearing on the screen.

And After getting his PhD in biblical psychology, he (the CVSA pusher) sold his soul and many others to the devil.

There is a very famous and powerful cult that uses tester-controlled "lie detectors" for brainwashing. Hint: John Travolta.
a false lie detector + a confession = a lie + a false confession detector

Once there were pocket calculators and you could count on them
to give you the TRUE answer to a Math question.
Now there are computers with worms, bugs, viruses, trojan horses,
porn, hackers, false advertisements, and demons in their brains!
What do you expect?
OF COURSE!!!

http://www.google.com/search?&q=lies&btnG=Search