Quote:

I have proven that you guys are all talk. I will not consider a lack of response a answer to my counter challenge, and it was the response I expected.

There was a response. It was that the challenge was issued to the "luminaries" of the polygraph field, i.e. examiners whose credentials are considered unimpeachable by their peers. You have yet to speak a word about your credentials.

Do you not agree that the polygraph elders will run from you like a man on fire if and when you go down in flames, assailing your credentials, calling you a “chart roller,” saying how any EXPERIENCED examiner would have easily detected the countermeasures, etc? Yes, or no?

Every time something goes wrong (which is often when dealing with polygraphy), there arises the same tired refrain: “The test is only as good as the examiner.” Before any type of challenge goes forward, it needs to involve an examiner with gravitas sufficient enough that this cop out will not be available. Somehow, I don’t think you fit the bill.