Nonombre,

Can you let us in on anything else that is spoken of in “polygraph circles”?  It would seem to me that a polygraph examiner making negative comments about George doesn’t make George look bad – it makes the examiner look bad instead.

I still can’t help but think that if polygraphy was a scientifically valid test then no one would give a rat’s ass about who was speaking out against it or what they were saying.  

As I have mentioned before, part of my job as a police officer involves traffic crash reconstruction.  If there was a web site claiming that the speed of a vehicle could not be determined by measuring the yaw mark it left on the road prior to hitting a tree, I wouldn’t give a moment’s thought to it.  Newtonian physics can stand the heat because they are valid scientific principles.  

I couldn’t care less if someone put up a web site advising people to play certain songs on their car radio or paint their car blue in order to foul up the yaw mark measurements – I might laugh at it but it certainly wouldn’t bother me.  

Why are so many polygraph examiners so upset with the web site in general and with George in particular?