Twoblock wrote on Nov 29^th, 2005 at 8:19pm:

mustbaliar He mentions debate but he hasn't offered anything about the polygraph to debate.

{sigh} For the umpteenth freaking time, read the findings in TLBTLD from the 1983 Congressional OTA report, and the 2002 NRCC report - read where it talks about accuracy rates in situations where there are no countermeasures attempted.  Then come back and tell me again then I haven't brought anything up for debate.

It's hysterical that now that I've done a little research and have formed some opinions that I'm being branded as a polygraph examiner.  I don't even know what these machines look like for crying out loud.

Listen, I won't take it personally and I appreciate that you were honest with me - but there really is not much debate happening here - just accusations that I'm making this whole story up or that I'm really some user whom I've never heard of.

To be blunt, the reason why I've "...made up (my) mind..." has a LOT to do with the fact that for the most part noone really attempts to debate anything on here except George and Drew.  At least when I disagree with them I can respect the fact that they are making a case, right or wrong, without being overemotional bitter flamers.