Guest,

My response to Doug Williams, which started this message thread, is in direct answer to the attack on AntiPolygraph.org and myself that he posted on his Frequently Asked Questions page.

Mr. Williams apparently has chosen to remove the language I quoted from his website, rather than defend it. Was it your intention to support his now withdrawn attack? That Mr. Williams helped you to pass a polygraph "test" long before AntiPolygraph.org went on-line, that he has expertise both in administering polygraph examination and in countermeasures, and that he provides his phone number does not answer the points I raised in my response to his attack. (Your mentioning these things does, however, raise the question of whether you might be Doug Williams posting in disguise.)

You ask, "And since when does giving away information make George an expert?" Again, in my response to Mr. Williams (you read it, didn't you?),  I make no specific claim to being an "expert." If I have written anything on polygraph matters that you believe to be incorrect, please feel free to post your concerns on this message board.

On a final note, how does our having cited Mr. Williams' manual in The Lie Behind the Lie Detector amount to biting the hand that feeds us?