Guys,

I'm baaacck. For a little while anyways. Had to come back and help the lovely wife get things ready for our 50th. wedding anniversary bash.

This is further evidence for my research in my belief that "subject matter that triggers anger, and yes fear, in innocent polygraph examinees will show deception on the relavant questions. In the stated case here, at least 10 of the 11 are false +s because they were severely affected by the subject matter.

A while back in another thread, I asked questions concerning this issue and neither the pro-polys or the anti-polys touched them. I did receive a couple of private e-mails. One, I know is a polygrapher, the other knew too much about the polygraph not to be one. One wholeheartedly concurring with my views. The other almost, with a qualification regarding the analog v computer methodology. This one said that the reason I didn't get a response to my questions is: the pro-polys know but classifies this a secret and the anti-polys don't know enough about the polygraph to answer.

This fall, after the mining season, I will begin my research (at my own expense) in earnest. I and others will be taking polygraphs, interviews with medical professionals, etc. When the research is over, I will write a paper for publication.

I wonder if the expense of this research is a deduction?

Batman: If it is, I may not be able to pay your salary next year. dig dig. Pushing your arm , you know.

Twoblock