The_Breeze wrote on May 21^st, 2003 at 5:45pm:

... Im seeing alot of posters lately make comments about "dusting" polygraphers or in one hero's example using sophisticated multi level countermeasures.  If you are taking multiple polygraphs you have probably not been hired.  Perhaps you would be more specific as to the agency and the polygrapher?  As no crime is committed in clenching your buttcheeks during a pseudo-scientific ritual, what would you fear from disclosure? simply post the results, or get your charts and show those as well.  In other words stop the idle boasting, and prove how easy this countermeasure business really is. You are not working for the agency anyway, and have nothing to lose. Awhile back George, I asked if you wanted to do this on an organized basis and post the results.  You have ignored that request in favor of unscientific, unprovable personal accounts riddled with factual omissions and exaggeration.

Breeze, that polygraphy is susceptible to countermeasures is well established. By contrast, no polygrapher has every demonstrated any ability to detect countermeasures. The discusssion you referenced above is to be found in the message thread Thanks to TLBTLD I PASSED!!!. Skeptical readers may judge for themselves whose arguments regarding polygraphy are based on "unscientific, unprovable personal accounts riddled with factual omissions and exaggeration."


Quote:

And as I looked around the site briefly George I noted that you are not censoring some of the same language that you felt necessary to censor in one of my last posts where BT showed his entire ass.  Is this intentional, or are you engaging in selective censorship on this "free" site?

You were not targeted for censorhip. On 18 March 2003, we upgraded the software used to run this message board. The new software included, by default, a "censor list" of vulgar words that would be automatically replaced by asterisks in all posts. This unintended "censorship" was discovered on 10 April and immediately removed.