Breeze,

Kicked the cat?  Lol, well that's over the line for me though I do admit to setting firecrackers off in anthills (no, no mailboxes).

Anyway, such fun aside, both your challenge and Drew's can not prove anything. They are inadequate from a statistical point of view and whatever their results, it would be the equivalent of spitting in the wind.

So let me suggest that conducting an appropriate, peer reviewed set of experiments on a sufficient population would further this far more. I also believe the study of countermeasures could be more fruitful since establishing base line "truth" is not at issue. Unfortunately, but understandably, federal research in this area has largely been classified for the last 10 years.  Any non-profits that might provide grant money for this endeavor?

-Marty