George
Your evading.
I do not care that others have not accepted your sites challenge, that is a personal decision.  I do not care that you believe your and Gino's document is the final authoritative word on the matter either.
I have asked why your collection of anti polygraph freedom fighters will not put action to words (endlessly rehashed, check BT's re-warmed response to me) It is a simple proposition.  By your own actions, stop talking about what a ridiculously flawed procedure polygraph screening is and do something about it. Why are you waiting for someone to prove your point by participating in a staged event, or publishing available information for your use?
After you have manipulated the hiring process, post the results to the world, and prove your point with something tangible. (rather than footnotes)
Stein is the only one who had the balls to specifically address the point, while incidently reinforcing one of mine-even though Im sure he did not mean to.
There seems to be a small group of people keeping this site alive with reasonable intelligence and vast amounts of energy (at the keyboard), why is this not translated into something joe average applicant can understand and use to his benefit?
If polygraphers are cowards for not participating in your countermeasure challenge, what label should we apply to someone who lacks the fortitude to back up thier convictions?