And we were all thinking that Beech Trees had found productive employment, and his donkey was travelling down another more productive path (faster than anyone can write about it).....but no, he's back- and just in time to spread holiday cheer!
I for one welcome you back, who else can be so condescending, arrogant, superficial or inexperienced?  Others had to pull double duty in your absence to pick up the slack you created.
It would help your calculations to include the dozens upon dozens of polygraphs, screening and criminal, that I have been apart of, but you are no doubt feeling witty just including my own personal polygraphs.  You asked what I should expect here, good question.  Let me sum up:
I expect a few inexperienced people such as yourself, with no practical experience other than thier recent "victimization" to dispense faulty advice to those who visit here that may actually want to learn about polygraph.  I expect hysteria, absurd inferences as to other writers intelligence, and superficial fiegned indignation to further your cause.  
I remember reading somewhere where you described your polygraph experiences as a mere formality as you applied sophisticated countermeasures.  I have a challenge of my own ( since its in vogue here ) so you few can advance your cause to the next level:
I propose that you, skeptic, anonymous, stein, Gino, or whomever (george is probably compromised) find agencies that polygraph before a background (your cherished 40%ers) and apply to that agency.  During your polygraph, apply what ever countermeasures are appropriate and then furnish proof on these pages (suitably censored) by posting your notices of passing or appointment letters. Drew or Mark can set up the procedure.
Now I realize what I am proposing amounts to real work on your parts, but why not put your actions where your assertions are? you are fond of telling each other how simple polygraphers are, and how a 10 year old can be taught countermeasures, why not furnish proof?  Think of it, with your actions alone, properly documented and maybe furnished to news organizations- you could advance your languishing cause in a very real way people could understand.
I doubt very seriously if any of you will leave the warmth of this site and become one of George's foot soldiers, its much safer to sound knowledgeable without the threat of continued failure.  When I hear someone like skeptic talk about what a burden it would be to be polygraphed every 5 (!) years as a reason not to seek employment with an agency, cries of BS can be heard!
With your knowledge of the process, and your belief of how polygraph is conducted, a test for employment or periodic screening should be the last thing you are concerned with.
That is unless, you are just not quite sure what your talking about. You will make the random error disappear.
So, until you prove how easy it is to manipulate the process by your own selfless efforts, few will believe you.  We will call this "the anti-polygrapher's dilemma".
Do have a good holiday, and let us know how you intend to proceed.