Stealth,

You raise a very good point. The approach of creating responses to one or two different relevant questions during each chart collection would only have some advantage if the polygrapher were using an objective scoring standard.

It is quite possible (and perhaps likely) that alwazracin's polygrapher was using the so-called "clinical" approach to polygraphy. This approach was described by Anonymous in the message thread Ways to Counter the Relevant/Irrelevant Technique? as "a polygrapher's euphemism for arriving at any conclusions/opinions that he cares to see/render based on any or no considerations he chooses to employ."

If the polygrapher is using this "clinical" method, then producing any reaction to any relevant question would likely be, as you put it, "shooting yourself in the foot."