PDD-Fed,

You invite scorn when you make such ridiculous comparisons.

You write:


Quote:

...In fact, if you were to compare the two publicications [Sic], you would find that JAMA is far more commercial and political in content than the APA journal...

...and considerably more respected too.  The problem with Polygraph is not that it contains advertisements from polygraph manufacturers, but that it contains little of substance and nothing that could be trusted to be anything other than polygraph-community filtered pabulum.  JAMA is cited internationally on an almost daily basis in the media and is read by countless individuals other than those in the medical profession.  This is because it is considered to be both informative and authoritative.  Polygraph is considered a joke even by the few serious psychophysiologists involved in polygraphy.  As you said, "Now c'mon."  Let's get real.  This comparison is about as phony as can possibly be...sorry if the truth hurts...