wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2002 at 9:22am:

Gordon, "...if you would use the relevant/irrelevant format with sophisticated subjects (i.e., those who understand the polygraph procedure), then on what scientific basis do you expect to be able to distinguish truth from deception using this (thoroughly discredited) technique..."

George, this is now the 2nd or 3rd time you have either used the term "thoroughly discredited technique."  or something along the lines of "Discredited by the polygraph community itself."  when discussing the R&I procedure.  Now, please forgive me if I do not get the quote exactly as it appeared, but my question is:

Exactly who are you quoting within the polygraph comunity when you claim the R&I to be a "thoroughly discredited' methodology?

PDD-Fed