Is there any chance this won't be "smothered in its crib"?
According to the  Washington Post of 22-06-2002
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26102-2002Jun21.html
  Senator Grassley is
raising objections to the actions of the former FBI  liason with
congressional investigation of the Waco case.   That same FBI deputy
general counsel is now,
by sheer coincidence, in charge of the intelligence panel's investigation
of the bureau's role in tracking terrorists before Sept. 11.  Grassley is
reportedly unhappy on the grounds that said liason  "continued to thwart and obstruct" the Waco investigation.  This assertion of congressional prerogative  seems
to be an unexpected good sign of a serious intention for congressional
oversight.   Or am I hopelessly naive?  Will the polygraph results
be given any credence?  Unless the FBI has adopted multivalued logic as its operational norm, the two "passes" would seem to be an obvious
contradiction (at least if they both bear on the matter at hand).