wrote on Jun 24^th, 2002 at 10:34pm:

1.  If you were here, I would SHOW you criteria in incidents of "controlled breathing".  Every examiner knows that you can still see scoring criteria in controlled breathing in most cases...

I see. So it's something you can't articulate, nor does it have a lexicon or nomenclature in plain English within polygraph chart scoring? If you can only truly 'show' us, I would presume your high-tech 'polygraph lab' into which the naive swagger might be equipped with a scanner with which you could scan a few examples and email to George, whom I'm sure would be happy to post here for all to see.


Quote:

2.  Who cares whether or not he "did" anything during the stim test?  What effect did that have on the outcome of the test?  Remember, HE TOLD THE TRUTH to his examiner.

He lied to the examiner during the stim test, Polycop! He artificially controlled his breathing and artificially augmented his reaction when the alleged 'number card' was announced. Are you telling me the polygrapher saw that and just let it past unmentioned?

He artificially controlled his breathing during the in-test phase. Are you telling me the polygrapher saw that and chose to disregard Canuck's attempts at countermeasures?


Quote:

3.  By the way, not to beat a dead horse, but after you folks were unable to come up with any plausable way to beat an R&I test, you simply changed tactics and started attacking the use of the format itself.

That sound you hear is not us laughing at your testing method, polycop-- it's your fellow polygraphers! We merely reiterated what your peer group has been saying for decades! Got a problem with that? Take it up with them, not us!