One of the things that comes through with most of the polygraph examiners and proponents posting on this site (Gordon, Public Servant and JB excepted, maybe a couple of more I'm missing),  is that in the debate on the validity or invalidity of the polygraph, it's almost always about us.  We're whiners, we're disgruntled, we're unpatriotic, we're losers, we're liars, we have no experience conducting a polygraph, we're unethical, we're blind followers of George, we're angry, we're resentful, and so on.

The more you talk about us, the more you reveal the bankruptcy of your arguments in support of the polygraph.

Now I know that some anti-poly people retort and make some personal attacks too, and some of those are probably unnecessary and a waste of time.  But they are, in comparison to posts about the polygraph itself, a small fraction.  Whereas the pro polygraph people seem to be obsessed with us, as though personal attacks on us might somehow make the polygraph technique valid.

So say what you want about us, but in the process, you should add: we're right.