uiop

If I am baiting, it is baiting for intellegent answers to valid questions.

I was on my college debate team. I won a very large percentage of my debates by giving intellegent answers to EVERY question asked and covering every aspect of the debate. If the other side refused/coundn't answer portions of the subject matter, they lost.

You made a statement, more tha once, about this site being sued. Surely you have a reason for making that statement. It struck me that you might have heard something to that effect or that you read something here that caused you to make that statement. You don't have to be a lawyer or know one iota about the law to give your reason for making that statement. So don't use that as a crutch.

As I stated, nonombre and other polygraphers has bragged that they will catch anyone using countermeasures. If that is so, doesn't it render countermeasure information on this site moot? If the info is useless then why do they constantly rail against George and this website? As I remember, one polygrapher did say "send them to us, George, and we will catch them". If he can, then give him a mark on the blackboard.

uiop, there is nothing in this post that requires legal knowledge to answer. Therefore, if you care to respond, please don't use "political sidestep".

There was a polygrapher that posted on this site, a long time ago, that I admired. His handle was Public Servant. He debated from the vest. I even offered him a moose hunt in Alaska. He put forth his side of the debate and left. He didn't continue to rail against  George and this site.