Add Poll
Options: Text Color Split Pie
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Apr 1st, 2021 at 3:20pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Whether the polygraph charts are hand-scored by the operator or machine-scored by a software algorithm matters little. Polygraphy has no scientific basis, and polygraph chart readings have no evidentiary value.
Posted by: Sid Wells
Posted on: Apr 1st, 2021 at 3:02pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Hello AP Board

I am seeking information on the reliability of automated polygraph scoring system vs the examiner call of Deception of No Deception.

In talking to examiners here in Canada and down South - USA it appears no one can give me a good explanation.  What I do hear is personal preference?