Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 1 post(s).
Posted by: xenonman
Posted on: Jun 20th, 2013 at 7:23am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Does an applicant who was rejected for a TS/SCI clearance due primarily to derogatory infoirmation gathered during a BI have any legal recourse?

I reviewed my file from the wonderful CIA, pursuant to a Privacy Act request which I had made.

During the BI, it appears that a number of individuals interviewed (none authorized or suggested by me to be contacted) made derogatory (and largely inaccurate) comments about me.
Is there any legal recourse against the individuals involved?

Of course, as I've learned now, the BI is little more than a popularity contest, and a concerted effort to dig up dirt. Angry
 
  Top