Add Poll
Options: Text Color Split Pie
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jun 1st, 2015 at 8:37am
  Mark & Quote
It seems that Jeffrey K. Warner's polygraph countermeasure training came to light in connection with Operation Lie Busters, probably through the seizure of Chad Dixon's business records. The U.S. Department of Justice, in its position on sentencing in the case of U.S. v. Chad Dixon, notes, among other things:

Dixon trained at least seven other sex offenders:

J.K.W. of Quincy, Illinois, was a registered sex offender convicted in December 2010 for possessing child pornography. J.K.W. had his probation revoked and was fined $2,000 after he was found to have taken Dixon's polygraph countermeasures training in violation of his probation. The evidence showed that J.K.W. was trained in February 2011, prior to later passing polygraph exams in March 2011 and July 2011.


It's also worth noting that the training Dixon provided to Warner seems to have been effective, despite the fact that Dixon, an electrician by trade, had no special background in polygraphy and provided his instruction based largely on what he learned from Doug Williams' material.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Apr 2nd, 2013 at 8:36am
  Mark & Quote
Don O'Brien of the Quincy, Illinois Herald-Whig reports:

Trying to beat polygraph test costs Quincy business owner $2,000 fine

Posted: Apr 02, 2013 4:44 AM CEST Updated: Apr 02, 2013 5:56 AM CEST
Herald-Whig Staff Writer

A Quincy business owner had his probation from a 2010 child pornography case revoked and was fined $2,000 Monday after he was found to have been taking a polygraph counter measures course.

Jeffrey K. Warner, 57, owner of Warner's Dry Cleaning, was sentenced to 30 months probation on Dec. 20, 2010 after he pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. While on probation, Warner paid a man $1,000 for information on how to manipulate polygraph tests.

Assistant State's Attorney Anita Rodriguez said Warner met with the man in Missouri while he was there for court-approved medical treatments. She said that polygraph tests are important tools in the treatment of sex offenders and that Warner had made any results of any polygraph tests given to him no good by obtaining the information.

Judge Robert Adrian found that Warner violated terms of his probation by meeting with the man when he was only allowed to go to Missouri for medical treatment.

"This is a significant violation of your probation," Adrian told Warner. "Obviously, you were trying to subvert the conditions of your probation."

Warner avoided jail time because of a medical issue. He had a double lung transplant surgery in May 2009.

"The nature of this violation is significant," Rodriguez said. "If this was anyone else, we would recommend a sentence to the Department of Corrections. But with Mr. Warner's medical history, it's not worth putting that expense on the state or on the county."

Rodriguez asked for a "significant fine" and suggested the $2,000 total.
Warner said he took the course because he "was afraid of the false test results." Reading from a written statement before Adrian made his decision, Warner said he had seen innocent people fail polygraphs when he worked in the retail industry.

Warner's attorney, Terry Anastas, asked that Adrian not send his client to prison.

"It's not appropriate to consider Mr. Warner for incarceration," Anastas said. "He is more susceptible to illness. No further probation is necessary. He has not offended while he has been on probation."
Adrian said that sending Warner to prison "would be a death sentence" and that a sentence of county jail time "would only set the county up for liability."

Warner must pay his fine within six months. The case originated on Oct. 28, 2008 when authorities said they received a tip about child porn being on his computer. The Illinois State Police Crime Lab assisted in the investigation. Information in the case was filed on Feb. 26, 2010, and Warner was arrested on March 8, 2010. He posted $1,000 bond that day and has been free since.


I note that while the title of the article suggests that Warner attempted to beat the polygraph, the article doesn't actually document that he answered any relevant question untruthfully during the course of any polygraph examination.

This article raises a couple questions: would it have been a violation of probation had the countermeasure training taken place in Illinois instead of in Missouri?

And if, as averred by Assistant State's Attorney Anita Rodriguez, obtaining information about polygraphy makes polygraph results "no good," then is it not foolhardy to rely on polygraph results at all, considering that such information is freely available to anyone who seeks it on websites such as this one?