Add Poll
Options: Text Color Split Pie
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Nov 1st, 2007 at 4:05pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Although it doesn't deal at any length with polygraph screening, for a list of modern espionage cases see "Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens, 1947-2001" by Katherine L. Herbig and Martin F. Wiskoff:
Posted by: nopolycop
Posted on: Nov 1st, 2007 at 3:29pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Does anyone know the total nmber of spies who have been identified and convicted of spying since the CIA/FBI/DOE or any other government agency with access to national secrets started polygraph screening?  If this number is known, how many of these convicted spies also passed polygraphs prior to service, or as part of on-going "national security" testing?   Lastly, is there a list by name of these individuals?