Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: Ludovico
Posted on: Sep 29th, 2007 at 6:10pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Someone email that pup a tin-foil hat. Quick.
Posted by: 1904 - Ex Member
Posted on: Sep 28th, 2007 at 2:15pm
  Mark & Quote
Red_Rider wrote on Sep 25th, 2007 at 2:46pm:
Sorry Gents, I mis posted this yesterday. I have a question about these layered voice systems.  If there are old secret telephone recordings made without your knowledge or consent, and there was personal information about child pornography, pedophilia, kick-backs, hidden income, and other embarrassing information, could this be used against me in a court of law?  Can they really use this layered voice technology to verify it is my voice and I was involved in these activities?  My wife knows a lot of attorneys and I would be in big trouble if this is the case.  I know they can do this by analyzing computers, but can they also do it with voice recordings?  Any advice would be helpful.  It seems that paradiddle doesn’t think these devices are very good, but the other guys seem to make a pretty persuasive case that they work.  I would think that if the U.S. military uses them they must be pretty good.  I hope you other gents are right and they don’t work.


What I find to be even more intriguing is how any attorney would consort with stupid people.
The mind boggles.
Posted by: Red_Rider
Posted on: Sep 25th, 2007 at 2:46pm
  Mark & Quote
Sorry Gents, I mis posted this yesterday. I have a question about these layered voice systems.  If there are old secret telephone recordings made without your knowledge or consent, and there was personal information about child pornography, pedophilia, kick-backs, hidden income, and other embarrassing information, could this be used against me in a court of law?  Can they really use this layered voice technology to verify it is my voice and I was involved in these activities?  My wife knows a lot of attorneys and I would be in big trouble if this is the case.  I know they can do this by analyzing computers, but can they also do it with voice recordings?  Any advice would be helpful.  It seems that paradiddle doesn’t think these devices are very good, but the other guys seem to make a pretty persuasive case that they work.  I would think that if the U.S. military uses them they must be pretty good.  I hope you other gents are right and they don’t work.
 
  Top