You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
The new police chief in Memphis "failed" a CVSA that was checked by "lying Bill" of NITV when she was a police officer in Atlanta. Therefore, I doubt she would allow any type of so-called lie detection equipment.
Posted by: Maz Posted on: Mar 13th, 2022 at 1:52am
My husband was let go from a PD and although he has passed 3 polys in the past now that he is looking for a new opportunity he has failed 2 polys. He is being truthful so we assume it is just stress that is causing this. Does he have any hope at passing one after failing 2? ANy advice would be appreciated!
Posted by: SantaClaus Posted on: Feb 9th, 2012 at 3:42am
I'm wanting to say you can add Cleveland Police Department to the list, it doesn't mention anything about it on their website anyway. Can anyone confirm this?
Posted by: Bill_Brown Posted on: Nov 23rd, 2011 at 5:33pm
Some posts on the net and on this site list DC Metro Police as not having a poly. A recruiter informed a friend of mine today that they do poly to his surprise.
Posted by: Dispatcher 08 Posted on: Aug 10th, 2011 at 4:55pm
To determine if an agency requires CVSA or polygraph, click on the type of agency (i.e., Police/Sheriff/School, etc.) and then click "Requirements and Pre-Requisites." A spreadsheet will open.
Posted by: BBernie Posted on: Nov 22nd, 2009 at 3:56pm
I read your posts and you ask some pretty good questions. Why don't you write your legislators and ask them about their federal polygraph policy? (IF) they answer and the answer is not to your liking, then why not campaign against them. They sure will not agree to be polygraphed to hold their jobs. While you're at it, ask them how they will/did vote on legislation that is taking this country down, i.e. Cap and Trade, socialized health care, NAFTA and the UN's:Law of the Sea Treaty.
Join the movement to "FLIP THE CONGRESS"
I have written a letter to Senator Feinstein. Unfortunately, I think not much will be accomplished because there is not enough political support to change things. Although I am sure many people have been victimized by the polygraph, not enough speak out about it. This website is a great venue and does a tremendous amount of good in providing accurate and timely information. The only way I can see that the polygraph will be eliminated in the hiring process is by having enough political capital....what I mean is that you have to be able to convince legislators that it would be worthwhile and in their best interests to do so...and others have written on here about that ...anything I do is going to have to keep this in mind, otherwise no progress can be made.
Posted by: pixkbi Posted on: Nov 21st, 2009 at 1:16am
I read your posts and you ask some pretty good questions. Why don't you write your legislators and ask them about their federal polygraph policy? (IF) they answer and the answer is not to your liking, then why not campaign against them. They sure will not agree to be polygraphed to hold their jobs. While you're at it, ask them how they will/did vote on legislation that is taking this country down, i.e. Cap and Trade, socialized health care, NAFTA and the UN's:Law of the Sea Treaty.
Join the movement to "FLIP THE CONGRESS"
Posted by: BBernie Posted on: Nov 20th, 2009 at 6:49pm
Washington, DC Metropolitan Police (NOT to be confused with Washington Area Metro Transit Authority who use CVSA)
US Park Police
TSA Federal Air Marshal Service
I have a question because I am confused about all of this. The TSA is a federal law enforcement agency ... I thought all federal law enforcement agencies were required to utilize the polygraph to determine truthfulness, honesty and integrity. But if that is not the case, then why is there disparity and lack on continuity within the federal government for using this tool? It would seem to me that there are valid concerns/reasoning that justify NOT using the polygraph. So my question to the legislators is why are other government agencies still using it if it doesn't provide a true indicator of a person's honesty and trustworthiness?? (Just asking because I am confused by all of this)...or is it just all a political decision that is used within each individual agency?
Posted by: Knightshaiid Posted on: Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:54pm
I am an undergraduate accounting student who would like to get a job with the federal or state government. My freshman year of college was a mess. I used drugs for a while mostly pot and even sold mushrooms a few times.(bad decision)
I no longer use drugs of any kind. I am not a dishonest person I have never stolen or cheated. I understand the CIA would never take me but would I have a shot with the IRS? Do they polygraph test? How about the government of CA?
Posted by: nomegusto Posted on: Dec 25th, 2008 at 4:30pm
I dug this up from an earlier post and it is still accuarte
You can try the CA Youth Authority, CA Dept. of Corrections, CA State Parole and many other state LE agencies except the CA Dept of Justice(they do poly), The LA Unified School District Police use the poly now, LA Airport Police and The Port of Los Angeles Police are agencies that do NOT poly.
Another point to remember is that that you found this website and you can learn the truth and get educated. Consider applying to other agencies that use a poly, read The Lie Behind The Lie Detector and be ready to pass
You can check the CA state personnel board site for state LE jobs www.spb.ca.gov
Fred F.
Posted by: Fly_boy Posted on: Oct 12th, 2007 at 6:16pm
California Dept. of Corrections does not Polly. The DOD Police do not Poly. I would think that most University Police do not Polly as well. I think that the SDSherrif Dept. does polly but their limitations on drugs is not so bad. Not sure about SD city police though.
Posted by: rice80 Posted on: Oct 9th, 2007 at 3:07am
Did you guys know that it's really scientifically possible to detect if a person has ever used (non-polar molecule, e.g. marijuana) drugs in their entire lives? Simply obtain through liposuction a 50 gm sample of human fat, extract and concentrate it. Then use readily available instrumentation to quantify and characterize. Um, the missing fat cells may be rapidly replaced by consuming vast quantities of Dankin Donets.
So, it is not necessary for law enforcement to use unreliable polygraph testing to discern drug usage history. Real science may be utilized.
Posted by: PentaFed - Ex Member Posted on: Sep 2nd, 2007 at 2:43am
Mr._ Olympia fails to understand that the information he disclosed in the referenced polygraph was obviously within acceptable parameters IAW the LE agency policies in which he applied. Even the FBI accepts a small degree of drug use as long as it does not exceed the acceptable parameters as set forth.
triple x
Posted by: Lord_Darkclaw Posted on: Feb 6th, 2007 at 4:02pm