Add Poll
Options: Text Color Split Pie
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: antrella
Posted on: Apr 5th, 2006 at 5:53pm
  Mark & Quote
I'm sure this happens more frequently than one would assume. A "secret" clearance is pretty much a credit check and a criminal background check, and costs the government probably on the order (I would guess) of ~$1,000. A TS background check costs upwards of $20,000. 

That said, the TS check kind of "includes" a secret check. I'm sure there are tons of folks out there in low level civil servant jobs that require a Secret clearance who are applying for positions that require a TS clearance. Surely, a few will be denied. 

I think if they're denied for reasons that may also deny them a Secret clearance (i.e., the TS background check reveals concealed bankruptcy, criminal convictions, etc), the Secret clearance may also be stripped. Otherwise (grossly unfavorable comments from a litany of friends, supervisors, etc), the Secret clearance would probably remain intact.

As you say, however, it's probably circumstantial. If the TS background checkers discover something very troublesome, they'll probably inform a supervisor. If it's a judgment call of some kind, and no real red flags, the Secret clearance is probably good to go.
Posted by: John_Doe_Forever
Posted on: Apr 5th, 2006 at 3:45pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Is being denied a TS grounds for dismissing an active Secret clearance?  I imagine it's circumstantial but can anyone provide some details/stories?