Add Poll
Options: Text Color Split Pie
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Nov 29th, 2007 at 10:19am
  Mark & QuoteQuote

It is not uncommon practice to omit helper verbs from titles and headings.
Posted by: pete155
Posted on: Nov 29th, 2007 at 5:51am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I have no comment as to whether or not LAPD requires the actual passing of a polygraph as a requirement to being hired.  I would comment about whether "LAPD Dropping Requirement to Pass Polygraph?" is a question.  If that sentence were to be spoken and there were intonation on the word polygraph, then yes it would invoke the interrogative mood.  But the written sentence LAPD Dropping requirement to Pass Polygraph is a statement (declarative sentence).  Simply adding a question mark for punctuation is grammatically incorrect.   For this statement to be a question, a "helper verb" is required.  Is LAPD dropping requirement to pass polygraph?  
 I don't wish to comment as to whether Mr. Mashke was intentionally trying to deceive anyone.  I just want to clarify the issue.  The first time I read it I missed the question mark and thought LAPD actually was dropping the polygraph requirement.
Posted by: G Scalabr
Posted on: Nov 28th, 2001 at 1:25pm
  Mark & Quote
Mr. Weinstein,

Thank you for posting to this forum. You can rest assured that none of your posts will be deleted. We value the input of polygraph examiners, especially luminaries in the field such as you. Unfortunately, many examiners tend to cease participating once they end up on the receiving end of a well-reasoned argument. The purpose of this post is to convey my personal request that you not choose to depart in the same manner.

In the thread entitled LAPD Dropping Requirement to Pass Polygraph? you accuse George Maschke of misleading others about polygraphy and attempt to cite Mr. Maschke’s creation of this thread as a specific example of this alleged misconduct.  He and others responded, "pulling your card" by effectively demonstrating that the only post that was actually misleading was yours. Certainly the language struck by the Civil Service Commission is justification for George to begin a thread "LAPD Dropping Requirement to Pass Polygraph?" In other words, his post asks "Is the LAPD dropping the requirement that those who submit to mandated polygraph screening actually pass the 'test'?" and invites discussion of the matter.

I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you didn't see the question mark after George's post and the paragraph struck by the Civil Service Commission. As a show of good faith, please consider elaborating on the "routine" way in which Mr. Maschke has misled anyone about polygraphy.

Furthermore, I would be interested in your opinion as to why current American Polygraph Association President Skip Webb declined to participate in a moderated debate against Mr. Maschke to be held on the website of Chicago Tribune columnist Eric Zorn. According to Mr. Zorn, Mr. Webb would have been given the last word--yet he declined. One would think that Mr. Webb would have relished the opportunity to set the public straight and clear up any misconceptions created by the "misleading" information put out by Mr. Maschke and others who explain that polygraph "tests" are unreliable and easily defeated by countermeasures.

I eagerly await your response.