Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 11 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 29th, 2003 at 3:31am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
See also, "FBI digs up thousands of spy's documents" by Associate Press correspondent Curt Anderson:

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_news/6404129.htm
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 29th, 2003 at 3:25am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
CNN reports that "FBI agents have recovered more than 10,000 pages of highly sensitive secret documents buried by convicted spy Brian Regan before his August 2001 arrest, government sources said Monday." See, "FBI digs up secret documents in spy case."
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 13th, 2003 at 9:33am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Jury selection begins today (13 Jan. 2003) in U.S. v. Regan, with opening arguments scheduled to begin on 27 Jan. See Washington Post staff writer Tom Jackman's article, "Execut ion Possibility Intensifies Spy Trial."
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Apr 20th, 2002 at 8:07am
  Mark & Quote
In a front page article titled "U .S. Set to Seek Death in Spy Case" in today's (20 April 2002) Washington Post, Brooke A. Masters reports that the U.S. will seek the death penalty for Mr. Regan. The government also plans to present during the sentencing phase evidence that Regan actually committed espionage, and didn't just attempt to do so.

Jerry Seper of the Washington Times also writes about the Regan case in an article titled, "U.S. to seek death penalty in spying case" and David Stout writes about it in a New York Times article titled, "U.S. Sets Goal of Death Penalty in Air Force Sergeant's Spy Case."

See also the government's "Noti ce of Intent to Seek a Sentence of Death" filed in U.S. v. Regan (137 kb PDF).
Posted by: beech trees
Posted on: Apr 10th, 2002 at 6:40pm
  Mark & Quote
Quote:

beech trees,

Regan's polygraph in 1995 seems to be well before the commencement of his alleged conspiracy to commit espionage. I believe the CIA tries to polygraph employees once every five years; perhaps the NRO follows a similar schedule. If so, Regan would have been due for another polygraph by the time he retired from the Air Force and began work with NRO contractor TRW in October 2000.


Agreed, although we will probably never know what was in Mr. Regan's heart and mind at that time (1995) about what he would do in the future. Perhaps he feared military prosecution more so than criminal and was merely biding his time. Ms. Bowers told me that NRO employees are polygraphed at hiring and then 'aperiodically' thereafter.

Quote:
Did Ms. Bowers indicate that Regan was not polygraphed after the CIA polygraph in 1995?


She only confirmed the one. She neither confirmed no denied knowledge of Mr. Regan taking any other polygraphs, she just said she had no knowledge of any others.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Apr 10th, 2002 at 5:41pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
beech trees,

Regan's polygraph in 1995 seems to be well before the commencement of his alleged conspiracy to commit espionage. I believe the CIA tries to polygraph employees once every five years; perhaps the NRO follows a similar schedule. If so, Regan would have been due for another polygraph by the time he retired from the Air Force and began work with NRO contractor TRW in October 2000. Interestingly, Regan's SCI access was only restored in July 2001, by which time he was already suspected of espionage. I wonder if the delay in restoring his SCI access was because he needed to be re-polygraphed?

Did Ms. Bowers indicate that Regan was not polygraphed after the CIA polygraph in 1995?
Posted by: beech trees
Posted on: Apr 10th, 2002 at 5:09pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Ms. Cathy Bowers of the National Reconnaissance Office, Office of Corporate Communications confirms that Brian Regan was administerd a counterintelligence polygraph interrogation, conducted by the CIA, in 1995 as a condition of his initial employment with the NRO. Mr. Regan had a long military career prior to being employed by the NRO, and earned a Top Secret as well as SCI rating.

Tangentially Ms. Bowers informed me that the NRO has their own polygraph interrogators, DoDPI trained.
Posted by: beech trees
Posted on: Apr 10th, 2002 at 3:49pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I am in touch with the NRO to determine whether or not Mr. Regan was ever administered a polygraph while a contractor for the NRO.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Feb 16th, 2002 at 1:12pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
The 14 February 2002 indictment is now available as a 1.9 MB PDF file at:

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/regan/usregan021402supind.pdf 
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Feb 15th, 2002 at 12:22pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
On 14 February 2002, a grand jury returned a new four-count indictment of Regan. (He had been charged with one count of espionage in October.) An Associated Press article about the new indictment is available here:

http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?type=1&cat=0100&id=0202150312281730 

Brooke A. Masters and Dan Eggen of the Washington Post also report on the new indictment in a story titled, "Indictment Says Suspect Tried to Sell Defense Secrets":

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A12737-2002Feb14?language=printer 

No word is available on the results of any polygraph screening "test/s" to which Regan may have been subjected.

The earlier indictment, dated 23 October 2001, is available as a PDF file here:

http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/regan/indictment102301.pdf 
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Aug 25th, 2001 at 10:24am
  Mark & Quote
On the evening of Thursday, 23 August 2001, the FBI arrested retired U.S. Air Force master sergeant and National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO) contractor employee Brian P. Regan on charges of conspiracy to commit espionage. This case will doubtless be of some interest with regard to polygraph policy, because NRO is one of the prime users of counterintelligence-scope polygraph screening. Whether Regan was polygraphed at any time after he allegedly began conspiring to commit espionage is not publicly known, but at a minimum, if the allegations against Regan prove to be true, the prospect of periodic polygraphic interrogation did not deter him.

For more on this case, see "A ir Force Retiree Charged as Spy" by Brooke A. Masters and Vernon Loeb in today's (25 Aug. 2001) Washington Post as well as CNN.com's index page for this story.

For a more detailed description of Regan's alleged conspiracy to commit espionage, see the 19-page "Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint and Search Warrant" filed by FBI Special Agent Steven A. Carr (987kb scanned PDF):

http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/regan/usregancmplt82301.pdf 

 
  Top