Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jun 7th, 2001 at 9:33am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Fred,

Thanks for your kind words. I haven't received any further questions from the committee. I believe that at least one more public meeting will be held, but I don't know when. (There was some talk that it might be held in Chicago in June, if memory serves.)

Interestingly, at the meeting at which I spoke, Judge William Webster, who heads the blue ribbon panel reviewing FBI security procedures, had been scheduled to speak. He cancelled at the last minute, which no doubt served to sharply reduce media interest in the NAS polygraph meeting. One wonders whether he had this in mind when he bowed out. In addition, speakers from the FBI and NSA who had been scheduled to discuss those agencies' polygraph programs also (and for reasons they know best) bowed out on short notice.

Posted by: Fred F.
Posted on: Jun 7th, 2001 at 3:22am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
George,

I listened to your remarks several times as the audio is faint. It appears that you made a favorable impression on the panel. I applaud your efforts

Do you know if any follow-up has or will be scheduled?


Fred F.   Wink
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jun 7th, 2001 at 3:01am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Audio recordings of the second public meeting of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council's polygraph review panel held on 27 April 2001 are now on-line at:

http://www4.nas.edu/webcr.nsf/MeetingDisplay2/BCSS-I-00-01-A?OpenDocument

I was invited to speak at this meeting, and you'll find my opening remarks (and follow-up questions from the panel) beginning about 5 minutes and 45 seconds into the following Real Player file:

http://video.nationalacademies.org/ramgen/dbasse/042701_3.rm

and continuing into the next file:

http://video.nationalacademies.org/ramgen/dbasse/042701_4.rm

I would be happy to publicly address any questions about my remarks here.

 
  Top