You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
In addition, check out our SimpleX Chat-based chat room.
Saying there is no instance of a criminal passing the poly with Antipolygraph.org's help is a mere conjecture.
So, I didn't say that "there is no instance of a criminal passing the [polygraph] with AntiPolygraph.org's help." What I stated was "there is no instance where a criminal has been shown to have passed a polygraph examination with AntiPolygraph.org's help." See the difference?
Posted by: slickwilly Posted on: Sep 21st, 2025 at 5:45pm
This is a conundrum. Saying there is no instance of a criminal passing the poly with Antipolygraph.org's help is a mere conjecture. How would there be evidence of this? People have posted on this forum that they passed with the help of this site, but I know, that is all hearsay and we can't just believe it, right?
The criminals that have passed the poly while concealing crimes, such as Joshua Schulte, may have used Antipolygraph.org to help themselves pass. Even if criminals like Schulte mentioned to authorities that this site helped them pass, the authorities won't release this info. There will never be an official news source that will publish info about this site helping a criminal pass the poly. It just won't happen. Authorities don't want to give credit to this site.
If no official news will post it, and we can't believe the posts on this site, then how do we know who passed the poly (criminal or not) based on the help of this site?
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Sep 20th, 2025 at 1:03pm