just_me_again wrote on Jan 12^th, 2020 at 2:01am:


Yea, the record will become permanent. By how they word it, it seems like they won't use it anymore after a minimum of two years for any future investigations. There are a few posters on the Delphi BP forum who posted about failing 5 to 10 years ago; They reapplied after that amount of time and passed the poly the second go around.  By going off their experience, it seems like they don't use the failed poly against you. 


just_me_again wrote on Jan 12^th, 2020 at 2:01am:


Yea, the polygrapher ended up trying to dig into it, and making it seem like it was bigger than it was.... I held my ground and kept telling the polygrapher for almost two hours, that nothing else occused other than what I mentioned. Hopefully when I get the official email, I will have a chance to appeal it. If I do go through it again in a few years, I will definitely not add anything or repeat what I've already admitted to....

Thank you, George!
I may or may not give it another shot in two years. I pulled this off their website. 

"The suitability information provided by and collected on applicants, including CBP polygraph exam results, will be kept for a minimum of two (2) years for use in future background investigations."

Would you happen to know if they'll refer back to the previous poly for any admissions if I take a new one. Seeing as they say, they'll keep it for that long for future background investigations; I'm leaning towards no, but I'm sure they could always access it. 

I wish I would of read  the book on here before my exam. I would of made no admissions. My admissions were so minor and had no significance to me, that it wouldn't have even bothered me if I didn't say it.  I feel like I failed because I gave them something to write. If I do go through it again in two years, I really don't want to give the same admissions again, but I'm not sure if they refer back to it, and might just come back to me and say, "Well you said this over two years ago.".   

Thanks! 

George W. Maschke wrote on Dec 26^th, 2019 at 8:01am:

Wow. I just read parts of TLBTLD and now I regret not doing so before going to take my poly a few months ago.  Make no admissions however minor they are.  That was the mistake I made. I made a few insignificant minor, as as the book said; they spun it out of proportions.  I really feel like I would of passed if I didn't say anything. Now I'm doubting if I should go back for another try in a couple of years. 

George W. Maschke wrote on Dec 26^th, 2019 at 8:01am:

anotherguest,

As you'll note at page 128 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, we advise everyone against applying for any federal position that requires a pre-employment polygraph "test."

I think one is better off having just one failed polygraph on one's record than two.

For those who choose to ignore this advice, while I think applicants for positions of public trust have an ethical duty to answer relevant questions truthfully, they are under no obligation to volunteer irrelevant information, and are wise not to do so.

Bear in mind, however, that anything you've previously told your CBP polygraph operator is now a matter of record.

I also failed a few months ago. I just read in a different thread from another poster, that he made no admission, regardless of how small they were.  I made a few insignificant admissions and it seemed like, that was the reason why failed me. I kept getting questioned about it afterwards.  If you all know what it was, you'd laugh. It was minor and was irrelevant, but being the honest person I am, I just threw it out there.  I didn't know. 

If I go and take it again, do you suggest I make those admissions again, or simply don't mention anything at all? Gracias!

George W. Maschke wrote on Dec 24^th, 2019 at 10:28am:

Thank you for the reply. I asked that because I'm trying to figure out how to go about it in a few years if I do decide to go through the process again. 

George W. Maschke wrote on Dec 24^th, 2019 at 10:28am:

justhere,

I have seen nothing in CBP's polygraph policy documentation that suggests prior results and files are ever discarded.

I don't know whether it's standard for polygraph operators to ask the subject if (s)he is willing to come back for another one after telling him/her that he/she has failed, but it seems to be a common practice.

For reference, you'll find documentation of CBP's current polygraph practices here:

https://antipolygraph.org/read.shtml#TES-C

You'll also find a copy of the 2010 CBP polygraph unit's handbook, which predates the adoption of the TES-C screening format, as well as other CBP polygraph policy documentation, here:

https://antipolygraph.org/read.shtml#cbp

I forget to add.  Is it standard for all the examiners to ask if we're willing to come back for another test to everyone when they're told that they failed?

So that's what the nodding is for. I took the poly awhile back and for a few charts, the test administrator had me do the same thing.  I was wondering what the purpose of it was. The thing is, I didn't do any countermeasures.  I answered everything honestly. 

After the last few charts, I was told that I'm failing on one of the question. I have a very clean background. I'm hoping for a chance to re-test, but I highly doubt that I'll get it. The examiner just said, that they'll send my file to the OPR and they'll decide. 

I have a few questions and hopefully someone could answer. 

I know I'll have to wait two years to take it again. After two years, do they discard the prior results and the file? I'm asking that because I told them a few things that are insignificant, but in the end, it was what I kept getting questioned about.

CBP's pre-employment polygraph screening technique is called the Test for Espionage, Sabotage, and Corruption (TES-C). You'll find documentation, including the questions asked, here:

https://antipolygraph.org/blog/2018/06/22/u-s-customs-and-border-protection-poly...

Got mine in [redacted] days, can ypu hive me a heads upf of the questions that will be asked?

Thanks 

Quote:

The idea of telling you to nod your head while answering could also have nefarious purposes. Even with the "silent answer test," instructing you to make physical movements when answering questions is not supported in any polygraph doctrine that I am familiar with. 

But your attitude is correct. With the exception of Baltimore City PD, it's tough to think of a less desirable place to work in law enforcement than CBP. I'd suggest that you focus on improving your CV and apply with agencies that offer more intellectually stimulating work. Preferably, those that do not force applicants to submit to this degrading pseudoscientific ritual. 

Thank you very, very much. The only "countermeasures" I used was measured breathing to try to allieve my anxiety. I always do that to relax myself to help get through these exams. Screw them. I bet they moved the tubes to illicit a fail response even though I was passing.

Quote:


CBP polygraph operators may be under pressure to produce pass rates that track with the organizational average of about 1:3. A CBP polygraph operator who passed more than this ratio might face unwelcome scrutiny.

In addition, with respect to your second CBP polygraph, the safest thing for your polygraph operator to do was to confirm the result of your prior CBP polygraph.

Note that while CBP does hire contractors to perform polygraph interrogations, who are handsomely paid for conducting this pseudoscientific ritual, not all CBP polygraph operators are contractors. Many are federal employees.

Quote:


It is not normal to have to adjust the pneumograph tubes after each chart collection, and I don't know what could account for this. You'll find the federal polygraph school's instructions for placement of pneumograph tubes at pages 4-6 of the document, Attachment and Placement of Polygraph Instrument Recording Sensors.

Quote:


This is the so-called "Silent Answer Test" that is sometimes employed when the polygraph operator suspects that the subject is employing polygraph countermeasures. We address it at p. 165 of the 5th edition of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector:

Quote:


You also ask:

Quote:


It is unusual for a pneumograph tube (most likely the bead chain) to break during any particular polygraph session. It is even more strange that this occurred during both of your CBP polygraph interrogations.

Thank you for the responses. I get the money factor Doug but why would they fail me twice? Clearly they see my commitment if I came back to endure more of this a second time. Wouldn't that prove to them I have nothing to hide even more? What are your thoughts on the constant movement of the breathing tubes after every set of questions? How could the results be usable if the equipment was always moved.

Michelle, 

Allow me to interject some perspective...

Polygraph "testing," at its very best, is a crapshoot. 

The result is nothing more than the examiner's semi-educated guess.

As for the examiner's antics and accusations that occur in the polygraph suite, it's all theater -- in my opinion.

I've been a member of the American Polygraph Association since 2004, and have tried repeatedly to bring enlightenment and reason to the APA's political machine. All to little avail. 

As Doug Williams has so succinctly pointed out, polygraph "testing" can be largely about money. I agree. 

But that's just my opinion, based on 15+ years of experience and observation.

As an aside, it's very interesting... Whenever I post on this site I soon get a flurry of inquiries requesting special "help." 

I find the timing to be most queer.

Thus far, not one such needy individual has been able to pass my authenticity test.

Strange, no?

The company that administers polygraph exams for the CBP charges $2200 per test so they have a vested interest in failing as many people as they possibly can simply because the more people they fail, the more tests they run to fill the openings. It’s simple math.

I've taken seven polygraphs in my life. All of them for LEO positions. I have passed all polygraphs except the two I have taken with CBP (3 years apart). All of the examiners use the same software and technique. They all use the same physical equipment. However, some how, miraculously, I fail CBP and pass all others without even a question of deception? The CBP examiner claims I lied about "serious crimes" and "drug usage". Both times with CBP I was accused of lying about those same questions but never when asked those questions with other departments. What could CBP possibly be doing differently that they show readings there and no one else does?

Most importantly, can someone knowledgeable explain this strange behavior for me please-

During my recent CBP polygraph the examiner asked me seven series of questions. After each series they released the cuff and then came over to me and completely adjusted the pneumograph tubes to different areas. At one point both tubes were on top of each other very high up by my breasts. Why would they keep moving the tubes after each series of questions then say I failed? They also told me to not answer the questions verbally at one point and to only "nod my head yes or no". They said they would be watching me and could see the subtle movements but in me peripheral vision I could see every time that they were only looking at the monitor and not me. What's up with that? 

Then finally, at one point the lead of one of the pneumograph tubes "broke" and I was told to sit outside while they fixed it. This happened on both of my CBP polys only. Both times they moved the tubes constantly and something "broke" at some point. What the heck?