Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: get-real-already
Posted on: Nov 5th, 2018 at 4:59am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
No person administering any legitimate forensic and/or psychometric test would ever ask for the outcome(s) of previous such tests, as it could only serve to create bias. 

Yet we see this all the time with polygraphy. They ask if you have ever taken a polygraph. If you say next, you can be guaranteed that the next question will be "did you pass?" 

Thus, polygraphy is not a standardized test. It is unstandardizable interrogatory interview.

Related note, F-the-CIA. No idea why you would want to work there anyway.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Oct 31st, 2018 at 9:13am
  Mark & Quote
Tina,

I have not seen any formal policy guidelines on this topic, but to the best of my knowledge and understanding:

1. If the previous failed polygraph was with the CIA, they will reject your application;

2. If the previous failed polygraph was with another federal agency, they may (or may not) reject your application;

3. Your having failed a previous polygraph, regardless of the agency that conducted it, will tend to bias the polygraph operator against you and increase the likelihood that (s)he will arbitrarily accuse you of lying and/or using polygraph countermeasures.

My advice is not to seek employment with any federal agency that has a pre-employment polygraph screening requirement. I previously limited this recommendation to the FBI, but similar considerations apply to all federal agencies.

Note the warning of retired CIA polygraph John F. Sullivan, who advises that "...an honest subject has no better chance than a dishonest subject of getting through the process."

See also the recent statement of a former CIA analyst, who concludes:

Quote:
...I urge my children to steer clear of any job that requires a polygraph. That rules out entire professions: National Security, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, and Pharmacy. It's a shame. My career as an intelligence analyst was exciting, deeply rewarding, and just plain fun. I contributed to the safety of my country, which is a constant source of pride. But I no longer recommend my profession to others. The polygraph has become a deal breaker.
Posted by: tina
Posted on: Oct 31st, 2018 at 7:00am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
When you apply for CIA they ask about past polygraphs. anybody know if I say I had one before and failed will they reject my application?  Sad
 
  Top