Wandersmann wrote on Sep 30^th, 2016 at 1:19pm:


That reminds me of an account I read in some book on corruption in the NYPD.

A detective during the Sixties insisted that a foolproof way to determine when a black suspect was lying was to watch to see if his stomach was moving "in and out". If it was, then the suspect was lying.

Yet, that "method" was still  probably more accurate than  the polygraph! 

xenonman wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 6:44pm:


Good idea Xenonman, except I have a much more efficient and scientifically advanced method to use on my dog.  I watch for him to wag his tail.  It's the same concept as the polygraph except it is far more accurate.

Huh? I've been over the original post a couple imps and still have a hard time with it....... Or is it just me?

Aunty Agony wrote on Sep 19^th, 2016 at 3:45pm:


What will be next - a polygraph for your pets?  lol 

Aunty Agony wrote on Sep 19^th, 2016 at 3:45pm:


It all sounds hilarious, but the alarming fact is that the polygraph is still held in such a mystical aura in our "popular culture".  That unfortunate myth gives rise to these increasingly bizarre applications for polygraphy!

You must forgive Aunty but she finds your situation deliciously hilarious: as soon as your wife passes an infidelity polygraph, you must instantly schedule another infidelity polygraph to find out if she was unfaithful during her most recent infidelity polygraph. 

Aunty is confident that if you keep this up long enough, you must perforce eventually encounter a polygraph operator who will give your wife what you fear for her to have. And then, one infidelity polygraph later, the truth will come out and you will be obligated to execute her to maintain the honor of your family. 

Go home. Love your wife. Let her love you. Regard her with fondness and respect. Treasure her, because with your twisted attitude towards women, you'll not get another. Stop wasting time and energy on polygraph tests; they don't work anyway. And trust Aunty when she tells you that you and your wife need to cleave very tightly to each other because nobody else wants either one of you.

Markinson, get the video of the polygraph "test" as well as examiner's charts, notes, etc.

As a full member of the American Polygraph Association, I would be happy to review your wife's polygraph examination(s) at no charge.

If you are told these items are unavailable, consider the "test" null and void.

Aunty is rarely speechless but she is having a lot of trouble with this one.

something to think well for husbands or boy friends who are thinking of such a test

I made an appointment for an infidelity test for my wife with a polygraph tester who confirmed the test will be done in his office. When the test date neared, he asked to arrange hotel room for the test. During the test lasting 3 hours only the wife and tester will be in the hotel room. If the woman knows she will fail, there is every possibility that the woman will seduce the tester and get the report she wants. So I refused.

I made appointment with a female tester. She has a boss and no one else in the office. When the test started I was asked to leave the office and the front door to the office was locked. I cannot go in without their permission. After 3 hours I was called in and informed that your wife is tired and not fit to take the test today and asked me to come next day.

Next day she pass the test. I noticed that the boss (man) was in control as a quality checker of the test. Did the female tester  collude with her boss for him to enjoy on the first day? My wife had full day rest before going to test on the first day. What probably happened on the first day for 3 hours?

In fact one test was done earlier by a male polygraph tester. On the last minute the tester with whom appointment was made called and said he had an accident and he can send his colleague if I agree. Due to uncertainty when he will recover and since I was travelling from another country, I agreed. This tester had brought paper to cover any glass windows of the meeting room where the test was conducted. Nobody could see anything going on inside. In between I knocked on the door, it was not opened. I phoned him, it was not answered. She passed the test. 
 
In both cases the men involved were very arrogant and strict in answering any post test questions later on.
The infidelity test is done in a situation where the tester can use a willing subject if she is going to fail and make her pass(she could be willing for 2 reasons - enjoy and pass the test) .

Has anyone thought about such possibility for cheating of the husband? Is it necessary to have such privacy? Normally when male doctor examine a female, a female nurse will be present. Not in this case.  Is the the infidel   woman and male tester gifted with a chance to enjoy paid by the husband?