Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: quickfix
Posted on: Jul 28th, 2012 at 12:57pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
George:  here's one view:  it stinks.  NRO exceeded its authority by administering full-scope exams to its personnel.  To my knowledge, only NSA and CIA have authority to conduct full-scope testing, at least within the DOD community, and those are primarily pre-employment exams.  A cash bounty for admissions?  Sounds similar to the NFL's recent scandal involving the New Orleans Saints cash bounty program for injuring opposing players.  Hopefully, those individuals who authorized/directed this will be removed from their positions.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 28th, 2012 at 8:18am
  Mark & Quote
The McClatchy news group has published a well-researched investigative series by reporter Marisa Taylor on improper practices within the National Reconnaissance Office's polygraph program. Among the key allegations is that NRO has been targeting personal ("lifestyle") information even though it is only authorized to conduct counterintelligence-scope polygraph examinations. NRO polygraphers were (and perhaps still are) rated in part on their ability to elicit personal admissions from examinees.

The series also documents that when the head of the NRO went for polygraph screening, his odds of becoming a false positive victim were precisely zero. The polygrapher who examined him had been instructed to pass him. In addition, in at least one case where a serious and specific admission about child molestation was made, the NRO did nothing to advise law enforcement.

You'll find Taylor's initial 3-part series here:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/polygraph/

Subsequent to publication of Taylor's reporting, AntiPolygraph.org received a copy of an internal Defense Department (DoD) e-mail regarding how to respond to the articles (4.4 MB PDF):

https://antipolygraph.org/documents/dod-email-2012-07-11.pdf

For commentary on this documentation, see "DoD Reaction to McClatchy Reporting on NRO Polygraph Practices" on the blog.

Also, in a follow-up report published on 27 July, Taylor reports that Senator Chuck Grassley, a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, is calling upon the DoD inspector general to investigate whether the NRO is in compliance with DoD polygraph rules:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/07/27/158078/sen-charles-grassley-seeks-probe.ht...

I would be especially interested to hear the views of those in the polygraph community regarding the issues addressed in the McClatchy series.
 
  Top