You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
If you read the conditions of federal job announcements, you may see that "successful completion of a polygraph examination is required" is often in the announcement. If you don't successfully complete the polygraph examination, you haven't met the conditions for hire, and you're not further considered.
If you are already a gov't employee and you don't pass your poly, you cannot be fired based solely on the poly results; but you can be (and often are) moved to another position of equal pay that doesn't require the access for which the poly was originally required.
Posted by: leoroy jefferson Posted on: Oct 4th, 2011 at 7:13pm
I have read through a ton of d.o.d. and cia policy concerning polygraph results and disqualifcation from the hiring process. Posts by NSAreject etc. seem to suggest that these agencies cannot reject you purely based on polygraph results if no admission is given. If one were to take 3, 4, or 5 polygraphs in which no admission was made, but dispite speaking the truth, the individual never passed.....could this individual be failed purely on the basis of polygraph results? Especially if the background investigation etc does not back up the suspicions?
D.O.D policy seems to state that if one that is already an employee, one can not be fired based on polygraph results, but little is mentioned about those in the hiring process. And regardless of D.O.D policy, the NSA and CIA (i do understand the cia is not under the dod) have many congressional exemptions. Anyways, it seems like post people who were failed on this site, made the mistake of an admission or they voluntarily quit the application process.
For those who stay in the process and submit themselves to multiple polygraphs, is there any hope that the polygraph can not be the all deciding factor and instead the background investigation would be focused on?