You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
For the record, I was the one who exposed Mr. Coffey (forgot his first name), polygrapher extraordinaire. He used to post here as TheNoLieGuy4You. He was the one who accused GM of spying for Iran, with absolutely no evidence. Talk about smear.
I also was the one who identified "Anonymous too", and "Ed Earl" as being the same guy who posted here for years as "Sancho Panza". GM later exposed him as Ed "E.B." Van Arsdale, in Ponza City Ok.
Guess these guys just can't take their own medicine.
TC
P.S. T.S. Elliot is likely Van Arsdale, but who cares?
P.P.S. For anyone so inclined, feel free to expose me. I really don't care.
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Jul 11th, 2009 at 10:30pm
Thanks but I regret even asking. I didn't know you posted personal stuff about your users on this site. I feel kind of suckered in.
You don't seem too ethical after all and you apparently keep track of your users to embarrass them later when you feel the need. I hope this isn't the case but how do I know you're not going to post my information if I ever have a polygraph test coming up?
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Jul 6th, 2009 at 9:46am
It depends on the employer. Agencies that require employees and/or applicants to submit to polygraph screening typically do not exempt their polygraph operators from this requirement. But not all polygraph examinations are created equally. Polygraphers failing polygraph screening examinations is virtually unheard of. I am aware of only one case wherein a polygraph operator failed an employment-related polygraph examination. (The polygraph examiner in question had fallen out of political favor with the CIA's Polygraph Division.) On the whole, polygraphers polygraphing polygraphers seems to be an act of mutual masturbation.
Do polygraph examiners have to take a polygraph themselves for employment? It would only seem fair that if they believe in the procedure and validity of the exam that they would need to pass one themselves.