Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 11 post(s).
Posted by: nomegusto
Posted on: Feb 14th, 2008 at 11:55pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Depends on who's asking... 
Some might believe in your phylosophy, other's don't...
Posted by: Question Everything
Posted on: Feb 14th, 2008 at 9:22pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
What I meant was the ends don't justify the means; much like torture.
Posted by: nomegusto
Posted on: Feb 14th, 2008 at 8:12pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Torture?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Huh

How do you equate a polygraph to torture?

You sit in a room, answer questions, ask questions if your confused about something. Get hooked up to the computer, or the analog equipment. Say yes/No for a couple of hours. If there's a problem, you'll be questioned some more (at which your free to walk out of at any time). 

Torture is the physical, or mental harm to gain information.

There is no physical harm done, and the emotional stress is your doing? Now your not gonna feel better about yourself, and have self doubts, but thats an entirely different emotion then receiving actual torture. If you think it's that bad for a prescreen well Don't do it, and find another profession. If it's for a criminal case, well your decision. If it's post conviction... Don't break the rules of your probation.  Cool
Posted by: Question Everything
Posted on: Feb 13th, 2008 at 5:04pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I'm glad I found this board and Mr. Maschke's book before I eventually schedule my polygraph.  I was always skeptical of the test and how they could prove if you were lying or not based on lines.  I now have no doubt that this test is a bunch of bunk and no different than torture in some ways.  The ends don't justify the means!
Posted by: T.M. Cullen
Posted on: Feb 13th, 2008 at 7:13am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
"What I feel bad about is that untill I was falsy accused and subsequently failed a polygraph I would have assumed some one to be guilty based on a Poly result."

That's true of most people.

Look at it this way, now we know something most others don't.

I just wish more people could find this board BEFORE their scheduled polygraph.  They usually come after it is too late.

Posted by: nopolycop
Posted on: Feb 12th, 2008 at 7:24pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
T.M. Cullen wrote on Feb 12th, 2008 at 7:13pm:
The polygraph test is an INTERROGATION, in which a prop, that simply measures levels of autonomic arousal , is used to intimidate and cause self doubt on the part of the test subject.  

The goal is to get the subject to say things that would make his/her attorney soil their undies (if they were present), and to otherwise self incriminate themselves and get them to "crack", regardless of whether or not they are guilty or innocent.

Oh, yeah, it's also a fun prop to use on TV pseudo-reality shows!   Grin


Don't forget it's stellar reputation for catching spies and weeding out undesirables from LE careers. 
Posted by: T.M. Cullen
Posted on: Feb 12th, 2008 at 7:13pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
The polygraph test is an INTERROGATION, in which a prop, that simply measures levels of autonomic arousal , is used to intimidate and cause self doubt on the part of the test subject.   

The goal is to get the subject to say things that would make his/her attorney soil their undies (if they were present), and to otherwise self incriminate themselves and get them to "crack", regardless of whether or not they are guilty or innocent.



Oh, yeah, it's also a fun prop to use on TV pseudo-reality shows!   Grin


P.S.  The sad thing is that it indiscriminately ruins peoples lives and/or reputation, and endangers our national security.
Posted by: notguilty1
Posted on: Feb 11th, 2008 at 4:29pm
  Mark & Quote
George W. Maschke wrote on Feb 11th, 2008 at 8:31am:
ruan,

You need to understand that polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis. It's in the same league as other pseudosciences such as phrenology and graphology. Be aware that there are no truly competent polygraph examiners. While some may be talented interrogators, they do not have any special ability to determine whether a person has spoken the truth.

For a thorough debunking of polygraphy, see AntiPolygraph.org's e-book, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, which may be downloaded here:

https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

No one should attach any weight to your polygraph results. They are evidence of nothing.


George,
Thanks for all your info on this site. I have read many of your posts and I have gotten an education.
What I feel bad about is that untill I was falsy accused and subsequently failed a polygraph I would have assumed some one to be guilty based on a Poly result. I now know better Thanks Wink
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Feb 11th, 2008 at 8:31am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
ruan,

You need to understand that polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis. It's in the same league as other pseudosciences such as phrenology and graphology. Be aware that there are no truly competent polygraph examiners. While some may be talented interrogators, they do not have any special ability to determine whether a person has spoken the truth.

For a thorough debunking of polygraphy, see AntiPolygraph.org's e-book, The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, which may be downloaded here:

https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

No one should attach any weight to your polygraph results. They are evidence of nothing.
Posted by: notguilty1
Posted on: Feb 10th, 2008 at 4:58pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Hi Ruan,
I too had a similar situation. I was accused of  a crime, did not do it, was truthfull on my poly and failed!
I had no medical condition and I was told my poligrapher was at it for 30 years. 
IMO te test is inadmissable in court because it is not effective in detecting lies. IMO it only shows your reaction to the various questions.
Posted by: ruan
Posted on: Feb 9th, 2008 at 7:50am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Hi all,i recently underwent a polygraph test and failed.I'm writing this because i did not commit the crime and i told the person about my medical conditions and he said it would not affect the polygraph results.
I suffer from very high levels of anxiety,depression,add,adhd,bipolar,and have a chemical imbalance in my brain.I still havnt found anything on medical conditions.can someone please help me with correct answers and correct advice.PLEASE!this has ruined my life!and it has affected everyone around me.and i believe the polygraph examiner was not competent!
 
  Top