You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
Not all potential employers interrogate or try to "clear up" weak issues after a test and it does not mean a pass. It could have been something said, it could be a failed test and no reason to retest or try to fix things and move on.
Sackett
Posted by: AnonymousFool Posted on: Apr 9th, 2008 at 12:04pm
Just wanted to update the thread. I did receive a favorable review and have moved on. There is validity to issue of no post-test interview, but obviously the circumstances differ for everyone.
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Apr 27th, 2007 at 7:57pm
It is customary for polygraphers to conduct an interrogation and seek admissions when the polygraph charts are scored as "deception indicated." Thus, the absence of a post-test interrogation is a very positive sign. That said, there is simply no way of divining whether you might be called back for yet another polygraph session.
Posted by: AnonymousFool Posted on: Apr 27th, 2007 at 12:26pm
I apologize if this topic has been answered before, but I could not find direct confirmation of this. I did review LBTLD and that didn't provide an answer. If you did not receive a post interrogation after a 2nd polygraph it is possible your chances of passing are 50/50 or better. To clarify matters, after my first polygraph I was interogated on a crime issue, but I remained honest and didn't change my stance. My 2nd polygraph ended and I didn't receive any post interogation. My assumption from the various comments I have read is that 1) The interogator could be bluffing and not admitting I failed, 2) I actually passed, or 3) Inconclusive. Any comments are greatly appreciated. Oh, the agency is CIA.