Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 4 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 24th, 2007 at 9:15pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
AntiPolygraph.org has proposed language for a Comprehensive Employee Polygraph Protection Act that would close all loopholes in the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988. To date, no member of Congress has introduced such legislation, but I would encourage you to contact your representative and senators asking that they do so.

There is no need, as LieBabyCryBaby suggests, to wait until a real lie detector is invented before abolishing one (the polygraph) that doesn't work. The states of Massachussets, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Oregon, which have outlawed all workplace polygraph screening, even for law enforcement agencies, are living proof that the polygraph is an unnecessary evil.
Posted by: LieBabyCryBaby
Posted on: Jan 24th, 2007 at 5:56am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I agree. The polygraph isn't going anywhere. Since it's the best tool we have--whether it's 70% accurate or 95% accurate--it will be around until something better comes along either to replace it or be combined with it.

The polygraph process--which includes not just the machine itself, but the whole process from pre-polygraph interview to post-polygraph interrogation--is an excellent tool and has proven itself much more than it has failed, at least in the minds of the powers that be who advocate and benefit from its use. Therefore, don't expect to see it disappear at least for the next decade or so.
Posted by: Fair Chance
Posted on: Jan 24th, 2007 at 1:51am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Dear fender85,

Not close at all to ending the use of polygraph usage in the Federal Government.  The FBI is "changing" the drug policy of appilcants because the specific amount of times that drugs are used is causing "confusion" within the polygraph testing.   

This is a great spin on the fact that many applicants have been disqualified by polygraph usage strictly based on polygraph results and appealed.  The FBI polygraph community is defending their "failure rate" based on the fact that it is the applicants" psychological reaction to the drug usage question rather than the inaccuracy of the test itself.

They are not even close to giving up a machine which they think has great utility for confessions even if the scientific validity is nothing short of very questionable.

Regards.
Posted by: fender85
Posted on: Jan 23rd, 2007 at 11:16pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
How close is our country to outlawing these silly machines from pre-employment? Is it anywhere in the near future?
 
  Top