Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 7th, 2007 at 1:49pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Drew,

Agreed! I am preparing correspondence to Senators Grassley and Durbin, as well as others inside and outside government. While Dick Durbin was actually not the ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee (Pat Leahy, who presumably will be the new committee chairman, was), he seemed to be the committee member most outspokenly critical of polygraphy at the 2001 Hearing on Issues Surrounding the Use of Polygraphs.
Posted by: Drew Richardson
Posted on: Jan 4th, 2007 at 10:55pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
George,

I can see from reading the relevant blog topic (https://antipolygraph.org/blog/?p=102) ; that the FBI's answers to Senator Grassley's recent questions are no more responsive than they were a decade ago when he posed similar questions following my testimony (http://www.antipolygraph.org/hearings/senate-judiciary-1997/richardson-statement...; before his committee.  I would recommend that you send to his office, to the office of Senator Dick Durbin (the ranking minority member of that committee and now a part of the majority party), and to the relevant media a link to the blog and perhaps a link to the aforementioned testimony so that he and others might read your commentary regarding just how truly meaningless those responses are and to what a large extent he has now been stone walled on this topic over the last decade.  Regards, Drew
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 4th, 2007 at 6:25pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
 
  Top