LPInvestigator wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2006 at 7:46am:
My biggest question is will my knowledge and experience in deception methods and polygraphs effect my outcome of taking a polygraph test?
Quite possibly. Polygraph "testing" is based on the assumption that the examinee doesn't know the difference between relevant and "control" questions.
If you admit your knowledge of polygraph procedure to your polygrapher (as J.B. McCloughan, himself a polygrapher, suggests), you run the risk of being arbitrarily accused of deception and/or countermeasure use.
Quote:Should I apply countermeasures?
That's a call you'll have to make for yourself. But knowing that polygraph screening is completely invalid, and that many agencies have pre-employment polygraph failure rates on the order of 50% (much worse odds than Russian roulette), if I were in your shoes, I would definitely employ countermeasures rather than leave things to chance.
Quote:If so, should I practice these before I go and how much practice is required?
If you do choose to use countermeasures, it would be wise to practice as much as possible. You should understand polygraph proceduce well enough to identify relevant, irrelevant, and "control" questions on-the-fly, and to employ a technique such as mental countermeasures or tongue-biting without visible change.
Quote:How would you suggest I practice?
One thing you might do is to make a tape recording of a sample question series and practice the countermeasures as you listen to the questions being asked. Typical question series are found in the Federal Psychophysiological Detection of Deception Examiner Handook, the DoDPI Law Enforcement Pre-Employment Test examiner's guide, and the appendices of
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, which may be downloaded, respectively, at:
http://antipolygraph.org/documents/federal-polygraph-handbook-01-03-2004.pdf http://antipolygraph.org/documents/dodpi-lepet.pdf http://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf Quote:Will applying countermeasures risk my chances of not passing at all?
Possibly. If you mistake a relevant question for a "control" question, and augment a reaction to it, you're likely to fail. But there is no evidence that polygraphers have any ability to detect the countermeasures explained in
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector. Quote:If I must lie to a question is there anything different I need to do? (besides the countermeasures)
I think applicants for positions of public trust have an ethical obligation to answer relevant questions truthfully.
Quote:If I fail is it worth it to fight the decision?
Yes. Even if the decision is not ultimately overturned (it probably won't be), you don't want an uncontested accusation of deception to be the last thing in your file.
Quote:Is the VSA test the same as a poly?
No. But it, too, has no scientific basis.
Quote:Does it matter if the polygraph is computerized or analog?
No more than it matters whether your astrological chart is interpreted by a wizard or a computer.
Quote:When asked about what I know about the polygraph, what should I do and say?
Polygraphers want to hear something positive. You can tell your polygrapher that you've seen it on TV and in the movies, that a friend in law enforcement told you to just tell the truth and you'll do fine, or something similar.
As I mentioned above, if you admit to knowing that polygraphy is junk science and that you know about polygraph countermeasures, you're likely to incur the polygrapher's wrath and be arbitrarily accused of deception and/or countermeasure use.