You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
I think you are all correct. On our hires, our policy requires that the applicant obtain his own personnel files, but gives us a limited power of attorney for acting as his agent. This dilutes the company's power to refuse.
But absent a release form of some type, I can't just walk in, flash my badge and look at personnel files. Quite honestly, I'm glad I can't. Court orders of course change the rules.
Merry Christmas
Posted by: Sergeant1107 Posted on: Nov 11th, 2005 at 4:37am
I have to disagree with Sergeant1107, in that an agency short of a court order is NOT required to show a police department or even a federal agency any information on an applicant even if he did sign a release of liability.
This is completely dependant on the company as some will share the information and others will only divulge salary and date of hire information.
I agree that in most instances a private firm will not simply turn over personnel records to the police absent a court order.
However, private companies are legally compelled to allow a person access to his or her own personnel files. The release police applicants sign (at least in my department) is basically a request to see their own personnel files. That request is simply presented to the company by the detective doing the background investigation, rather than by the person making the request. Since the request is coming from the person to whom the personnel files are regarding, the company has no legal reason to withold it.
Posted by: dimas Posted on: Nov 9th, 2005 at 8:57pm
I have to disagree with Sergeant1107, in that an agency short of a court order is NOT required to show a police department or even a federal agency any information on an applicant even if he did sign a release of liability.
This is completely dependant on the company as some will share the information and others will only divulge salary and date of hire information.
Posted by: Sergeant1107 Posted on: Nov 5th, 2005 at 2:57pm
If you were to ask your company to see your personnel files they would have to allow you to. The waiver required by most agencies grants similar access.
Basically, you sign a waiver saying that you want to see your personnel record, but that you want to give it to the Anytown, USA police department.
Posted by: UrbanLaw Posted on: Nov 5th, 2005 at 8:32am
Had a question and figured there may be someone who may be able to answer this question.
During the background investigation, do local and state department have access to ones personnel files (h.r)? Just started the b.i. with a dept and had to sign a release form which allows the dept access to basically everything. However my company has a policy of being hard nosed on releasing info. They usually just provide date of hire, current status, salary etc. I know some dept send in survey forms to employers/supervisors asking them to rate employees etc. My main question is about having access to the personnel files themselves, is this common or done at all by non-federal agencies?