Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 6 post(s).
Posted by: Bill Crider
Posted on: Nov 22nd, 2005 at 7:54pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I don't think you could find anybody who hasn't tried marijuana, and I take a lot of credit for that," said Tommy Chong

this pisses me off because I think a lot of FBI polygraphers think like this as well.  Ive never used any. Of course, I couldnt convinve the FBI that I hadnt used it or that I hadnt sold any.
Posted by: Fair Chance
Posted on: Oct 25th, 2005 at 5:31am
  Mark & Quote
Readers,

USA Today again confirms that the FBI is re-evaluating its drug policy for applicants as I stated last May.  In the article, it states that it is not considering changing its policy for Special Agent Applicants.

Once again, it is a numbers game.  The FBI has more than enough Special Agent applicants that it can enforce arbitrary policies and get the numbers it wants.  Not so with "Professional Support Positions."  The numbers are lacking for these positions.

I believe that the "Professional Support Positions" are even more critical than Special Agent positions because support personnel control the flow of information which is fed to Special Agents.

Go to govexec.com and read about how they have to reinstate a special agent who said that their computer systems were in shambles and more.  

The FBI is quickly losing the faith even amoung its own ranks.

I just do not know what it will take to wake these people into the world of reality.

Regards.
Posted by: polyfool
Posted on: Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:04am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
George,

I agree. It's too bad the reporter who wrote the article missed a major piece of the puzzle by omitting the polygraph's role in regards to hiring problems within the FBI. Relaxing the agency's drug guidelines is not going to help with hiring problems. Applicants will continue to fail polygraphs. What a shame the agency didn't take the opportunity to re-evaluate the usefulness (or lack thereof) of the polygraph in its hiring process instead of wasting time and energy on a proposal to consider changing its drug guidelines. It would have been much better served by the former.
Posted by: Fair Chance
Posted on: Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:07pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
George, Drew,

I have stated earlier that the FBI is working around the edges because they cannot handle the problems getting FBI applicants and specifically, "support personnel."

The support personnel should be held to a higher standard.  They are the ones controlling crypto, communications, analysis, translations, etc., etc..

The FBI is in crisis.  The Emperor has no clothes. In five years, this is going to be quite evident.   

Regards.
Posted by: Drew Richardson
Posted on: Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:30am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Hopefully it will occur to those in the FBI with a grain of common sense that their drug-related hiring problem has little to do with changing prescribed limits (whether it be zero tolerance, liberal acceptance, or anything in between) of drug usage, but with any reliance on a diagnostic instrument (polygraph screening) that has no validity for determining compliance with whatever limits are currently in vogue.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Oct 9th, 2005 at 9:06pm
  Mark & Quote
Unfortunately, this article makes no mention of ending the FBI's misplaced reliance on the polygraph, which is wrongly eliminating many qualified applicants:

Quote:

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/12860309.htm

FBI considers relaxing hiring policy

TED BRIDIS

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The FBI, famous for its straight-laced crime-fighting image, is considering whether to relax its hiring rules over how often applicants could have used marijuana or other illegal drugs earlier in life.

Some senior FBI managers have been deeply frustrated that they could not hire applicants who acknowledged occasional marijuana use in college, but in some cases already perform top-secret work at other government agencies, such as the CIA or State Department.

FBI Director Robert Mueller will make the final decision. "We can't say when or if this is going to happen, but we are exploring the possibility," spokesman Stephen Kodak said

The change would ease limits about how often - and how many years ago - applicants for jobs such as intelligence analysts, linguists, computer specialists, accountants and others had used illegal drugs.

The rules, however, would not be relaxed for FBI special agents, the fabled "G-men" who conduct most criminal and terrorism investigations. Also, the new plan would continue to ban current drug use.

The nation's former anti-drug czar said he understands the FBI's dilemma.

"The integrity of the FBI is a known national treasure that must be protected," said retired Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, who used to head the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. "But there should be no hard and fast rule that suggests you can't ever have used drugs. As long as it's clear that's behind you and you're overwhelmingly likely to remain drug free, you should be eligible."

Current rules prohibit the FBI from hiring anyone who used marijuana within the past three years or more than 15 times ever. They also ban anyone who used other illegal drugs, such as cocaine or heroin, within the past 10 years or more than five times.

"That 16th time is a killer," McCaffrey said.

The new FBI proposal would judge applicants based on their "whole person" rather than limiting drug-related experiences to an arbitrary number. It would consider the circumstances of a person's previous drug use, such as their age, and the likelihood of future usage. The relaxed standard already is in use at most other U.S. intelligence agencies.

Entry-level intelligence analysts usually earn between $36,000 and $53,000, depending on qualifications and where they are assigned to work. Entry-level FBI special agents earn $42,548.

The FBI proposal contrasts with the agency's starched image and its drug-fighting history. A generation of video game players can remember seeing the FBI seal and slogan, "Winners don't use drugs," attributed to former FBI Director William Sessions, on popular arcade games from the late 1980s.

Private companies have wrestled with the same problem. Employers complain they can't afford to turn away applicants because of marijuana use that ended years earlier, said Robert Drusendahl, owner of The Pre-Check Co. in Cleveland, which performs background employment checks for private companies.

"The point is, they can't fill those spots," Drusendahl said. "This is a microcosm of what's happening outside in the rest of the world. Do we dilute our standards?" He said the FBI should have a low tolerance for any illegal behavior by applicants. "If they used marijuana, that's illegal. It's pretty cut and dried."

A recently retired FBI polygraph examiner, Harold L. Byford of El Paso, Texas, was quoted in a federal lawsuit in February 2002 arguing that "if someone has smoked marijuana 15 times, he's done it 50 times. ... If I was running the show there would be no one in the FBI that ever used illegal drugs!"

The proposed FBI change also reflects cultural and generational shifts in attitudes toward marijuana and other drugs, even as the Bush administration has sought to establish links between terrorists and narcotics.

"I don't think you could find anybody who hasn't tried marijuana, and I take a lot of credit for that," said Tommy Chong, the comedian whose films with Cheech Marin provided over-the-top portrayals of marijuana culture during the 1980s. "They're going to have to change their policy."

While marijuana use is hardly universal, it remains the most commonly used illegal drug in the United States, with about half of teenagers trying the drug before they graduate high school.

"What people did when they were 18 or 21, I think that is pretty irrelevant," said Richard Clarke, a former top White House counterterrorism adviser. "We have to recognize there are a couple of generations now who regarded marijuana use, while it's technically illegal, as nothing more serious than jaywalking."

An agency's attitude toward drug use has been blamed for unexpected consequences. The CIA forced one of its officers, Edward Lee Howard, to resign in May 1983 after he failed a polygraph test and disclosed his drug use in Colombia during 1975 when he was a Peace Corps volunteer. Howard defected to the Soviet Union in 1985 after he was accused of espionage activities that spy hunters believe were driven by resentment over his forced resignation.

"I had been totally honest about each and every misdeed in my past, including my drug use in South America and my occasional abuse of alcohol," Howard wrote in his 1995 memoirs. He died in July 2002 at his home outside Moscow.

Some other federal agencies also have tough marijuana policies. The Drug Enforcement Administration will not hire applicants as agents who used illegal drugs, although it makes exceptions for admitting "limited youthful and experimental use of marijuana." The DEA, however, permits no prior use of harder drugs.

"Recreational marijuana use is a fact of life nowadays," said Mark Zaid, a Washington lawyer who has represented people rejected for FBI jobs over drugs. "It doesn't stop Supreme Court justices from getting on the bench and doesn't stop presidents from getting elected, so why should it stop someone from getting hired by the FBI?"

ON THE NET

FBI employment policy: http://www.fbi.gov/employment/policies.htm

FBI recruiting video for intelligence analysts:

http://www.fbi.gov/filelink.html?file/real/recruit/intell_analyst.mpg
 
  Top