Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 1 post(s).
Posted by: polyrized
Posted on: Sep 14th, 2005 at 2:43pm
  Mark & Quote
One widespread misunderstanding is that polygraph interviews are for the purpose of determining if a person is trustworthy enough for a security clearance.  I believe polygraph examiners and agencies encourage applicants to believe this is the case as well.

But what they don't tell you is that the results of the polygraph examination may lead to a cancellation of an offer of employment based on 'suitability' considerations.  In these cases, which I believe are the majority, information is gleamed from the examination which is not disqualifying to a security clearance if it were formally adjudicated, but is frowned upon by the hiring agency.  When you are rejected based on these 'suitability' grounds you have much less recourse.  Further, when applying for a job at a different agency the 'derogatory' information may follow you even if that agency doesn't routinely use a polygraph!

This is the trap many find themselves in.  There are potential long term consequences to finding federal employment from taking a polygraph and being found 'unsuitable' even if you haven't engaged in any behavior which would render you unable to obtain a clearance.
 
  Top