You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
I don't know precisely when these antipolygraph laws went into effect, but all were enacted before AntiPolygraph.org went on-line in 2000. These five states get along just fine without pre-employment polygraph screening, and there is no reason the others can't, too. In addition, none of the democracies of Western Europe use pre-employment polygraph screening.
See the text of Minnesota's antipolygraph statute included in The Lie Behind the Lie Detector. It provides a good model for other states to follow.
Posted by: polyscam - Ex Member Posted on: Apr 15th, 2005 at 10:12am
That's great! Do you know how long ago these bans where put in place? Any "ammunition" to use on state legislators could only be helpful, especially if any of these bans are recent. If it takes one state at a time to "shut-down" polygraphy, so be it.
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Apr 15th, 2005 at 6:37am
That's correct. Pre-employment polygraph screening for law enforcement positions is prohibited by law in Oregon. In addition to Minnesota and New Jersey, Michigan and Massachusetts have also banned it.
Posted by: polyscam - Ex Member Posted on: Apr 15th, 2005 at 6:29am
I was just reading through some posts at the polyplace board. An examiner posting there states that Oregon law prohibits polygraph screening for law enforcement positions. Is anyone able to confirm this information?
I do know that both Minnesota and New Jersey prohibit polygraph screening for employment altogether. However, this is the first I have heard of Oregon's prohibition. If so...